pktriada.blogg.se

Space shuttle columbia disaster
Space shuttle columbia disaster







space shuttle columbia disaster

Crater was classified as a “conservative” tool based on its projections of ice projectile damage to RCC turning out to be more severe than that achieved experimentally. Crater was suitable for small debris impacts, on the order of 49cm3 – versus 19,665cm3, the estimated size of the bipod ramp foam. Without additional on-orbit pictures, the DAT was restricted to using a mathematical modeling tool called Crater, that predicts the depth to which debris will penetrate a Thermal Protection System (TPS) tile. The first formal DAT meeting was held on January 21st, five days into the mission.Ī trajectory analysis that used a computational fluid dynamics approach to determine the likely position and velocity histories of the foam (Credits: NASA Ref p61). The Department of Defense (DoD) Manned Space Flight Support Office began implementing the request, albeit with the assurance from MCC that this was merely information gathering, not a formal request for action. DAT contractor engineers prompted a NASA Shuttle manager to make a second imagery request. The Program Manager agreed to explore the possibility – this was the first imagery request of the mission.Ī Debris Assessment Team (DAT) was formed with NASA and contractor engineers. On the second day of the mission, the Intercenter Photo Working Group Chair contacted the Shuttle Program Manager for Launch Integration at KSC to request imagery of Columbia’s left wing on-orbit. – In the video below, the apparently trouble-free launch of Columbia STS-107. Columbia continued its 16 day mission without further incident – until Entry Interface.

space shuttle columbia disaster

MCC also emailed a short video clip of the foam strike. MCC stated there was “ absolutely no concern for entry” because the phenomenon had been seen before. On flight day eight, MCC emailed the crew that post-launch photo analysis showed External Tank foam had struck the orbiter’s left wing during ascent. Neither the crew nor MCC were aware that on flight day two an Air Force Command review of radar tracking data detected an object drifting away from the orbiter, that subsequent analysis suggested may have been related to the foam strike. The analysis revealed that the debris was approximately 53-68cm long and 30-45cm wide, tumbling and moving at a relative velocity of 670-922km/h at the time of impact. The impact was detected the next day during the detailed review of all launch camera photography that is conducted after every Shuttle launch. This incident was not seen by anyone on the ground or in the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Firing Room or Johnson Space Center (JSC) Mission Control Center (MCC)  there was no onboard indication to the crew. The foam impacted under the leading edge of the left wing at 81.9 seconds. At 81.7 seconds after launch, when the Shuttle was at about 20,000m and traveling at Mach 2.46 (2,655km/h), a large piece of insulating foam came off the External Tank (ET) left bipod ramp area, close to where the orbiter attaches to the ET. The Space Shuttle Columbia STS-107 was launched on Januat 10:39 a.m. This article presents a technical overview of the accident, its cause, and the post-flight consequences. The Space Shuttle Columbia disaster is one of the most tragic chapters of spaceflight history. A color enhanced, de-blurred still frame of the foam strike, derived from video recording (Credits: NASA).









Space shuttle columbia disaster